Id. Such additional sums eventually exceeded $99 million. If the testimonial privilege under the Clause is absolute and there is no distinction between oral and written materials within the legislative sphere, then the non-disclosure privilege for written materials described in Brown & Williamson, 62 F.3d at 421, is also absolute, and thus admits of no balancing, cf. 1153 (1952) (Jackson, J., concurring)). Services include, but are not limited to, wheelchair loans, sign language interpreting services, and adaptive tours. United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683, 94 S.Ct. In essence, therefore, what the Clause promotes is the Member's ability to be open in debate-free from interference or restriction-rather than any secrecy right. The affiant asserted that the Executive had exhausted all other reasonable methods to obtain these records in a timely manner. at 15, it does not deny that compelled review by the Executive occurred, nor that it occurred in a location where legislative materials were inevitably to be found, nor that some impairment of legislative deliberations occurred. Note: Last entry is at 4:30 p.m.Closed to the public on Sundays, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Day, and New Year's Day. The warrant includes special procedures in order to minimize the likelihood that any potentially politically sensitive, non-responsive items in the Office will be seized by identify[ing] information that may fall within the purview of the Speech or Debate Clause or any other pertinent privilege. Warrant Aff. at 37. Also in the third floor basement is a shooting range run by the U.S. Capitol Police and a basketball court. Room No. at 420. Senate Galleries: Two Senate Galleries are now open to the public. These non-case agents' reviewed the records in Rep. Jefferson's office only to determine if they [were] responsive to the list of items in the warrant, thereafter deliver[in] the seized records to the Filter Teams. Id. 2531, 33 L.Ed.2d 507 (1972) (emphasis added). The Galleries will open 30 minutes prior to the beginning of the session. Rayburn Horseshoe Entrance. HVC-215 A&B See infra pp. This particular search needlessly disrupted the functioning of the Congressman's office by allowing agents of the Executive to view legislative materials without the Congressman's consent, even though a search of a congressional office is not prohibited per se. Our district encompasses most of Seattle Although the Congressman's further request is solely for the return of property, his Rule 41(g) motion is tied to a criminal prosecution in esse against the movant, DiBella, 369 U.S. at 132, 82 S.Ct. 657-61. The question on appeal is whether the procedures under which the search was conducted were sufficiently protective of the legislative privilege created by the Speech or Debate Clause, Article I, Section 6, Clause 1 of the United States Constitution. The Clause provides that for any Speech or Debate in either House [t]he Senators and Representatives shall not be questioned in any other Place. U.S. Const. Senator Martha McSally (R-AZ), Congressman and Congressional Valley Fever Task Force Co-Chair David Schweikert (AZ-06), Congresswoman Karen Bass (CA-37), Congressman Greg Stanton (AZ-09), and U.S. Today, Congressman Kevin McCarthy, Co-Chairman of the Congressional Valley Fever Task Force, introduced H.R. 2531; see Fields, 459 F.3d at 9. at 114. 2531 (emphasis added). 2237 RHOB (Judiciary Committee) 919 (1913) (under Fifth Amendment [a] party is privileged from producing the evidence, but not from its production). See Brewster, 408 U.S. at 516, 92 S.Ct. This too should ameliorate concerns about deterrence. Remand Order of July 28, 2007. Capitol - Public tours enter through the Capitol Visitor Center; Official House business enters on the south side of the Capitol; Official Senate business enters on the north side of the Capitol.. Rayburn is named after former Speaker of the House Sam Rayburn. It And while it is true that, once it attaches, the Clause is an absolute bar to interference with legislators, Eastland, 421 U.S. at 503, 95 S.Ct. Steak n Shake is located adjacent to the Rayburn Cafeteria. We do not, however, hold, in the absence of a claim by the Congressman that the operations of his office have been disrupted as a result of not having the original versions of the non-privileged documents, that remedying the violation also requires the return of the non-privileged documents. 5. They include 18 U.S.C. The warrant was lawfully issued because it does not seek evidence of [a] legislative act generally done in Congress in relation to the business before it, United States v. Brewster, 408 U.S. 501, 512, 92 S.Ct. 2059 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515 at 420. 2445, 61 L.Ed.2d 30 (1979) (quoting Dombrowski v. Eastland, 387 U.S. 82, 85, 87 S.Ct. See In re Search of Law Office, 341 F.3d at 414 & n. 49 (holding that district court must find at the very least, a substantial showing of irreparable harm in order to suppress seized evidence under Rule 41(e), citing G.M. 2531, 33 L.Ed.2d 507 (1972), but rather evidence of crimes, see supra pp. House Galleries: When the House is in session, the Galleries will be open to Members of Congress who personally escort guests to the Galleries. 151 (1763)), I would conclude that the Speech or Debate Clause does not bar the Executive Branch's execution of a search warrant on a congressional office and, accordingly, deny Rep. Jefferson's Rule 41(g) motion.13. Studio B According to the affidavit, these procedures were designed: (1) to minimize the likelihood that any potentially politically sensitive, non-responsive items in the Office will be seized and provided to the [p]rosecution [t]eam, Thibault Aff. 2200 RHOB (Foreign Affairs Committee) HVC-210 Alcove at JA 79-87. Accordingly, we hold that a search that allows agents of the Executive to review privileged materials without the Member's consent violates the Clause. Letting the district court's decision stand until after the Congressman's trial would, if the Congressman is correct, allow the Executive to review privileged material in violation of the Speech or Debate Clause. The version of the Clause adopted by the Founders closely resembles the language adopted in the English Bill of Rights of 1689, which came out of the long struggle for governmental supremacy between the English monarchs and the Parliament, during which the criminal and civil law were used to intimidate legislators. 1. Includes site before construction; demolition of Wonders Court, apartment houses, commercial and government buildings, and garages. 201 (bribery of public official), 18 U.S.C. Accordingly, we hold that the Congressman is entitled to the return of all legislative materials (originals and copies) that are protected by the Speech or Debate Clause seized from Rayburn House Office Building Room 2113 on May 20-21, 2006. See 62 F.3d at 419. 3405. 78dd-1 et seq. Longworth Lobby Stakeout West July 28, 2006). See id. This markup took place in 2322 of the Rayburn House Office Building. When all of the brush is cleared away, this case presents a simple question: can Executive Branch personnel-here, special agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation-execute a search warrant directed to the congressional office of a Member of the Congress (Member) without doing violence to the Speech or Debate Clause (Clause) set forth in Article I, Section 6, Clause 1 of the United States Constitution? As such, if the touchstone is interference with legislative activities, then the nature of the use to which documents will be put-testimonial or evidentiary-is immaterial. Id. 07-0209 (E.D. According to the brief for the Executive, the Attorney General ordered the FBI to regain custody of the seized materials and imposed an immediate freeze on any review until the district court and this court considered the Congressman's request for a stay pending appeal. Longworth House Office Building - Main entrance, Independence and New Jersey Avenues. "[2] 2118 RHOB (Armed Services Committee) The Rayburn Room is a large reception room at the United States Capitol where members of Congress can meet with press or constituents. 749, 15 L.Ed.2d 681 (1966), and was to serve as a protection against possible prosecution by an unfriendly executive and conviction by a hostile judiciary, id. Rayburn has a five-acre footprint, and looming four stories over the Hill it is larger than the nearby Capitol building. Ford House Office Building - Entrance on 3rd Street, SW, near intersection with D Street, SW. Russell Senate Office Building - Delaware entrance on ground level closest to Constitution Avenue. Regardless of whether the accommodation is by initially sealing the office to be searched before the Member is afforded an opportunity to identify potentially privileged legislative materials prior to any review by Executive agents or by some other means, seriatim initial reviews by agents of the Executive of a sitting Member's congressional office are inconsistent with the privilege under the Clause. 1 (emphases added). WASHINGTON, DC Today, Co-Chairs of the Congressional Valley Fever Task Force David Schweikert (AZ-06) and Kevin McCarthy (CA-23) joined in celebrating Valley Fever Awareness Week in Arizona. 2614. 11. at 45. Disruption aside, it is well settled that a Member is subject to criminal prosecution and process. Washington, D.C. 20515 The Executive does not argue otherwise; the search warrant sought only materials not protected by the Speech or Debate Clause. The gym is below the sub-basement level, in a level of the underground parking garage, and according to The Hill, a newspaper focused on Capitol Hill, "features dozens of cardio machines outfitted with TV screens, an array of Cybex weightlifting machines and free weights. The Speech or Debate protected by the Constitution includes only legitimate legislative activity, see, e.g., Tenney v. Brandhove, 341 U.S. 367, 376, 71 S.Ct. The Speech or Debate Clause protects against the compelled disclosure of privileged documents to agents of the Executive, but not the disclosure of non-privileged materials. To the extent the Executive expresses concern about the burdens placed upon the district court and attendant delay during judicial review of seized materials, the Remand Order illustrates a streamlined approach by narrowing the number of materials the district court may be required to review. Please be as specific as possible in your description of the problem(s) encountered as well as the location on the website. Committees Committee and Subcommittee Assignments. 278 (1908) (quoting King v. Willkes, 2 Wils. This content is provided for the users convenience and is consistent with the stated purpose of this website. WebThe entrance to the Rayburn House Office Building is on Independence Avenue. 1310 LHOB (House Administration Committee) When the Senate is not in session, the two Senate Galleries will be open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday Friday, with the exception of Federal holidays. This chill runs counter to the Clause's purpose of protecting against disruption of the legislative process. 2359 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515 Organizational Meeting for the 118th Congress Watch on Fiscal Year 2023 United States Navy and Marine Corps Budget Wed, 05/18/2022 - 10:00am 2362-A Rayburn House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515 Fiscal Year 2023 Budget Request for the Department of See Appellee's Br. 2322 Rayburn House Office Building The Subcommittee on Innovation, Data, and Commerce of the Committee on Energy and Commerce held an open markup session on Tuesday, February 7, 2023, at 2:00 p.m. Johnson, 383 U.S. at 178, 86 S.Ct. Here, the warrant sought only fruits, instrumentalities and evidence of violations of various federal bribery and fraud statutes involving Rep. Jefferson,4 see Warrant Aff., reprinted in Joint Appendix (JA) at 7; Sealed Appendix (SA) 18-25, which plainly are outside the bounds of protected legislative activities, see Brewster, 408 U.S. at 526, 92 S.Ct. 654; it is of no moment that the indictment was filed in another district, id. WebOffice Room Phone Committee Assignment; D'Esposito, Anthony: New York 4th : R : 1508 Compare Amicus Br. HVC-210 (Speaker's Hearing Room) at 660, my colleagues first acknowledge that Brown & Williamson involved civil litigation, id. 837, 51 L.Ed.2d 30 (1977), distinguished between the receipt of privileged information by an agent of the Executive and by the prosecution team in the context of a civil rights claim based on a Sixth Amendment violation, the nature of the considerations presented by a violation of the Speech or Debate Clause is different. The Capitol Subway System, an underground transportation system, connects the building to the Capitol. The special procedures outlined in the warrant affidavit would not have avoided the violation of the Speech or Debate Clause because they denied the Congressman any opportunity to identify and assert the privilege with respect to legislative materials before their compelled disclosure to Executive agents. Fax: (202) 225-2908 Web2312 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 Phone: (202) 225-8220 Long Beach Office 4201 Long Beach Blvd, Suite 422 Long Beach, CA 90807 Phone: (310) 831-1799 South Gate City Hall Office 8650 California Ave South Gate, CA 90280 Phone: (310) 831-1799 Carson City Hall Office 701 E. Carson St Carson, CA 90745 Phone: (310) 831-1799 See, e.g., Brown & Williamson, 62 F.3d at 416.4. 378, 136 L.Ed.2d 1 (1996). at 660. As Gravel noted, his aide's privilege derives from the Member's. Clearly a remedy in this case must show particular respect to the fact that the Speech or Debate Clause reinforces the separation of powers and protects legislative independence. Fields v. Office of Eddie Bernice Johnson, 459 F.3d 1, 8 (D.C.Cir.2006) (en banc) (collecting cases). See generally 15B Charles Alan Wright, Arthur R. Miller & Edward H. Cooper, Federal Practice and Procedure 3918.4 (2d ed.1992). 783, 95 L.Ed. Execution of the warrant necessarily required the FBI agents to separate unprivileged responsive records from privileged records of legislative acts. Leasing Corp. v. United States, 429 U.S. 338, 359-60, 97 S.Ct. Contrary to the majority's assertion that [t]he Executive does not argue that the Clause's bar on compelled disclosure does not apply in the criminal as well as the civil context, Maj. Op. Our precedent establishes that the testimonial privilege under the Clause extends to non-disclosure of written legislative materials. House Triangle (East Front) That holding prohibited the production of certain records in a congressional subcommittee's possession in response to a civil subpoena. Web2244 Rayburn House Office Building. WebRayburn House Office Building. See Appellee's Br. at 36. United States v. Albinson, 356 F.3d 278, 279 n. 1 (3d Cir.2004). Noting that the purpose of the Speech or Debate Clause is to insure that the legislative function the Constitution allocates to Congress may be performed independently, without regard to the distractions of private civil litigation or the periods of criminal prosecution, id. Room No. The court ordered expedition of this appeal, id., and oral argument was heard on May 15, 2007. at 421. The Justice Department, therefore, could regain custody of the seized materials and resume review as of July 10, 2006. Perhaps more to the point, however, he contends that complete return of all seized materials is the only remedy that vindicates the separation of powers principles underlying the Speech or Debate Clause and serves as an appropriate deterrent to future violations. See United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683, 703-04, 94 S.Ct. Only after failing to obtain the records through investigative means within Rep. Jefferson's ability to control did the government turn to a search warrant, which minimizes Rep. Jefferson's role-and his Fifth Amendment right. On this reading of the Clause, Rep. Jefferson remains subject to the same criminal process that applies to his constituents. Open dawn to dusk, daily, including all weekends and holidays. at 661. Washington, D.C. 20515 WebThe Rayburn House Office Building, completed in early 1965, is the third of three office 511, 127 S.Ct. Open to the public Monday Friday, 7:30 a.m. 8:00 p.m. (Doors close at 6:30 p.m. when Senate is in recess). WebThe Architect estimated that the cost to June 30, 1966 (believed to be the estimated cost to completion), would be $98,209,685, including $8,955,685 for the subway between the Capitol and the Rayburn Building and for the pedestrian tunnels between the Longworth and Ray- at 660, amounts to prohibited question[ing] because the Clause embodies a broad non-disclosure privilege, Maj. Op. See Maj. Op. 4. See Appellant's Br. Language links are at the top of the page across from the title. Open 10:00 a.m. 5:00 p.m. daily, including all weekends and holidays.National Garden Open 7:30a.m. 5:00 p.m. daily, including all weekends and holidays. 371; Counts 3 & 4, Solicitation of Bribes by a Public Official, id. On May 24, 2006, Congressman Jefferson challenged the constitutionality of the search of his congressional office and moved for return of the seized property pursuant to Fed. Presidents are identified in bold. at JA 87-88 (internal citations omitted), the district court ensured that the warrant encompassed only unprivileged records. Congressman Jim Saxton was reportedly the source of the false alarm, after he mistook construction sounds in the garage for gunfire.[8]. House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology Republicans 2321 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 Phone: 202-225-6371 Fax: 202-226-0113 Studio A Where the Clause applies its protection is absolute. I disagree.6. Fields v. Office of Eddie Bernice Johnson, 459 F.3d 1, 13-16 (D.C.Cir.2006) (affirming denial of Member's motion to dismiss on Speech or Debate Clause ground but noting that even [w]hen the Clause does not preclude suit altogether, it may preclude some relevant evidence) (en banc), cert. They will open 30 minutes prior to the session and will remain open until adjournment each day. Although the presence of FBI agents executing a search warrant in a Member's office necessarily disrupts his routine, the alternative procedure proposed by Rep. Jefferson-sealing the office and permitting him to first label his records (paper and electronic) as privileged and unprivileged-would no doubt take much more of his time. Such a rule would also presumably apply to surveillance of a Member or staffer who might discuss legislative matters with another Member or staffer. Id. We agree, for the Executive retains in its possession seized materials, including complete copies of every computer hard drive in Room 2113, which contain legislative material.3 See City of Erie v. Pap's A.M., 529 U.S. 277, 287, 120 S.Ct. 2322 RHOB (Energy and Commerce Committee) Kevin was first elected to Congress in 2006 and is a native of Bakersfield and a fourth-generation Kern County resident. Contrary to the Executive's understanding on appeal, it is incorrect to suggest that Congressman Jefferson's position is that he was entitled to prior notice of the search warrant before its execution, without regard to the Executive's interests in law enforcement. For example, in Brewster, a case involving the criminal prosecution of a Member, the Supreme Court described the violation of the Clause that occurred in United States v. Johnson, 383 U.S. 169, 86 S.Ct. HVC-201 A&B Recognizing the strength of these constitutional interests, the Supreme Court limited the scope of executive privilege-which is unquestionably a confidentiality rule-by permitting in camera judicial review of executive records to meet [t]he need to develop all relevant facts in a criminal prosecution. Most important, to construe the Speech or Debate Clause as providing an absolute privilege against a seizure of non-privileged materials essential to the Executive's enforcement of criminal statutes pursuant to Article II, Section 3 on no more than a generalized claim that the separation of powers demands no less would, as the Supreme Court has observed, albeit as to a qualified privilege, upset the constitutional balance of a workable government. Nixon, 418 U.S. at 707, 94 S.Ct. The FBI agents' execution of the warrant on Rep. Jefferson's congressional office did not require the latter to do anything and accordingly falls far short of the question[ing] the court in Brown & Williamson found was required of a Member in response to a civil subpoena. 1343, 1346 and 1349 (wire fraud and deprivation of honest services), 15 U.S.C. at 420. at 665-66, thereby potentially depriving the Executive Branch of records bearing on criminality, it is a suggestion I categorically reject. 137-38. 2531. In re 3021 6th Ave. N., Billings, MT v. United States, 237 F.3d 1039, 1041 (9th Cir.2001). at 419, the court concluded that document production threatened to distract the two Members from their legislative duties, see id. Although the search of Congressman Jefferson's paper files violated the Speech or Debate Clause, his argument does not support granting the relief that he seeks, namely the return of all seized documents, including copies, whether privileged or not. Veterans Crisis Line: Call: 988 (Press 1) Social Media. Cf. Finally, the government repeatedly emphasizes the consequences for law enforcement if a non-disclosure rule is recognized in the criminal context. Any questions should be directed to the administrators of this or any other specific sites. 2614.9 The core activity protected by the Clause-speech in either chamber of the Congress-is a public act. Va. indictment filed June 4, 2007). Id. Additionally, with respect to concern about future actions by the Executive, this is the only time in this Nation's history that the Executive has searched the office of a sitting Member of Congress. at 81 (describing filtering procedures for paper records); id. Some site content requires additional applications or browser plug-ins. (emphasis added). HC-5 My colleagues qualify Brown & Williamson's reference to Gravel, noting it [was] not a Member who [was] subject to criminal proceedings or process in Gravel. I, 6, cl. 06-3105. Technical Standards for Web-based Intranet and Internet Information and Applications (. Nor has the Congressman argued that his assertions of privilege could not be judicially reviewed, only that the warrant procedures in this case were flawed because they afforded him no opportunity to assert the privilege before the Executive scoured his records. That does not mean that the Executive Branch is without power to execute such a warrant; it just as likely indicates that never before has the Executive Branch found its use necessary. The Thomas Jefferson Building is open to visitors Tuesday through Saturday from 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. By creating the Filter Teams and [b]y requiring judicial approval before any arguably privileged documents could be shared with the prosecution team, the search procedures as a whole eliminated any realistic possibility that evidence of Rep. Jefferson's legislative acts would be used against him. Appellee's Br. 1334 LHOB, Rayburn Foyer Currently, Immuno-Mycologics, Inc. 2059 Rayburn House Office Building Both also emphasized that the search warrant sought only non-privileged materials as a basis for distinguishing Brown & Williamson, and looked to the procedural protections afforded by the issuance of a valid search warrant available only in criminal investigations as eliminating any threat to Congress's capacity to function effectively. at 660, again begs the question whether Brown & Williamson's non-disclosure rule applies to criminal matters at all. at 15-16, and that any violation of the privilege does not deprive the Executive of the right to retain all non-privileged materials within the scope of the search warrant. The warrant affidavit also described special procedures adopted by the Justice Department prosecutors overseeing the investigation. at 26. 2531, 33 L.Ed.2d 507 (1972). Applying these principles, we conclude that the Congressman is entitled, as the district court may in the first instance determine pursuant to the Remand Order, to the return of all materials (including copies) that are privileged legislative materials under the Speech or Debate Clause. It was completed in 1965 and at 2.375 million square feet (220,644 m2) is the largest congressional office building and the newest House office building (the only newer congressional office building is the Hart Senate Office Building, completed in 1982). 201(b)(2)(A); Counts 5 to 10, Scheme to Deprive Citizens of Honest Services by Wire Fraud, id. We agree with the Ninth Circuit's holding that the 1989 amendment to Rule 41, eliminating the coupling of a motion for the return of property under Rule 41 and a motion to exclude evidence at trial, Fed.R.Crim.P. 136, and (2) to identify information that may fall within the purview of the Speech or Debate Clause privilege, U.S. Id. Contact us. On July 11, 2006, Congressman Jefferson filed a notice of appeal and a motion for a stay pending appeal. 1494, 1501, 164 L.Ed.2d 195 (2006) (internal quotation omitted), and, as noted, the Supreme Court has made clear that the Clause does not purport to confer a general exemption upon Members of Congress from criminal process, Gravel, 408 U.S. at 626, 92 S.Ct. 371; Count 2, Conspiracy to Solicit Bribes by a Public Official, Deprive Citizens of Honest Services by Wire Fraud, id. art. Although in Gravel the Court held that the Clause embraces a testimonial privilege, id. R. Crim. Rayburn was completed in early 1965 and is home to the offices of 169 representatives. Earlier efforts to provide space for the House of Representatives had included the construction of the Cannon House Office Building and the Longworth House Office Building. The filter team would make similar determinations with respect to the data on the copied computer hard drives, following an initial electronic screening by the FBI's Computer Analysis and Response Team. House Office Rayburn House Office Building Room 2026 Phone: 202-225-2280 Fax: 202-273-9988 ocla-cls@va.gov; Senate Office Russell Senate Office Building Room 189 Phone: 202-224-5351 Fax: 202-273-9988 ocla-cls@va.gov; CONNECT. at 10. Moreover, the FBI agents responsible for the search of Rep. Jefferson's congressional office went to great lengths to minimize disruption8 by, inter alia, executing the warrant when the Congress was not meeting, imaging computer hard drives rather than searching the computers, using specific search terms for both paper and electronic records and, most important, creating Filter Teams-one for paper records and one for electronic records-and ensuring subsequent in camera judicial review to minimize exposure to privileged records. Nonetheless they believe Brown & Williamson's discussion of the Clause was more profound, applying equally in the criminal context merely because it repeatedly referred to the functioning of the Clause in criminal proceedings. Id. To go to Rayburn, you must take the escalator down to the Rayburn sub-basement. 749; see also Tenney, 341 U.S. at 372, 71 S.Ct. at 179. The U.S. Capitol is open to the public for tours Monday Saturday from 8:30 a.m. 4:30 p.m. Webthe building and one in the southwest corner of the building. See infra pp. WebWashington D.C. Office 2312 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 at 660, in Brown & Williamson we relied heavily on the Clause's purpose-shielding the legislative process from disruption-in reading the Clause's prohibition of question[ing] broadly to protect the confidentiality, see Brown & Williamson, 62 F.3d at 417-21, of records from the reach of a civil subpoena. See United States v. Dorcely, 454 F.3d 366, 375 (D.C.Cir.2006) (carefully considered language of the Supreme Court, even if technically dictum, generally must be treated as authoritative (quoting Sierra Club v. EPA, 322 F.3d 718, 724 (D.C.Cir.2003))). In order to maximize accessibility, this site has been designed to conform with: House.gov includes code and content provided by third parties. Attachments A and B, respectively, described Room 2113 and the non-legislative evidence to be seized. It is this aspect of the warrant's execution that Rep. Jefferson claims violated the Clause because it constituted impermissible question[ing] of him. 2. The FBI agents reviewed every paper record and copied the hard drives on all of the computers and electronic data stored on other media in Room 2113. These services include adaptive tours of the Capitol building, wheelchair loans, and interpreting services for individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing. The Office of Congressional Accessibility Services(link is external)(OCAS) provides a variety of services for individuals with disabilities. inyo county sheriff news, thai bl actor birthday february, krystal coach wiring diagram,
Pros And Cons Of Operation Ceasefire,
How Long Do Asos Refunds Take,
Miss America 1969,
Space Coast Daily Arrests Today,
Mauser Rifle Serial Numbers Database,
Articles R